The John Batchelor Show

Brief

History of Ambush

| 2 Comments
 
Remember when it was 20th century edgy that Harrison Ford's POTUS James Marshall in "Air Force One" (Wolfgang Petersen, 1997) took the risk of committing his presidency to fighting terrorism as an evil...?  (more)
Learn the Hard Way.  

Air_Force_One.jpg"Atrocity and terror are not political weapons," declared the grouchy Harrison Ford, "and to those who would use them, their day is over." This was early second term Bill Clinton, before the Monica Lewinsky looniness, and the presidency still appeared virile, experimental, an exercise in state-to-state power when dealing with the failed states of the former Soviet empire.  Mid-90s, while this was being constructed out of a 1995 screenplay pitch, the interpretation was that terrorism was a policing theme, that the 1993 World Trade Tower attack had been a one-off by nut cases, that Israel's battle with Arafat launched terror was not a threat to the homeland, and that the notion of a terror strike on the US air fleet was Hollywood bunkum exaggeration.  What a blood simple version of threat analysis for Harrison Ford to charge into with Vice President Glenn Close and a handsome terror op in Gary Oldham.  Within the next year there was the East Africa embassies attack, August 1998, and the cruise missile counter-attacks into Afghanistan terror camps that missed Bin Laden by hours, but there was still no grand theme of warfare.  Though there had been the capture of Ramzi Yousef in January 1995, no one much had the details of the scale of the Bojinka plot against airliners.  No one much had Al Qaeda's outlines at all.  The International Front for Combatting the Crusaders and Jews was still on a jihadist wish-list.  POTUS Clinton learned the hard way with the Cole in October 2000; then POTUS Bush learned the hard way with 9-11-01.  Will POTUS Obama learn the hard way with Hasan and 12-25-09?   

Target Yemen.  

Most presidents have been ambushed by history from a completely blinding direction.  How those wounded presidents responded was the measure of their time.  POTUS Obama responded cautiously, slowly, defensively, as suits a man who came to the office thinking the closing GITMO, and changing the word from "terrorist" to "extremist," and reaching out an open-hand to kleptocrats in Riyadh, Cairo, Baghdad, Kabul, Islamabad, San'a, Damascus and Tehran, would answer the threat of the jihadists.  Now may be a transition from peace in our time to war in double time.  Yemen is the new show-boat target.  JSOC, Predators, blockade, scrupulous data mining and analysis, and a strong hand on the money flow into the Dubai jihad bankers, all will answer the call.  POTUS Obama has to believe he is at war with the International Front and its state sponsors.  Can we picture POTUS Obama declaring to a roomful of worshipful EU/Ummah diners, "Atrocity and terror are not political weapons, and to those who would use them, their day is over."  What I can picture is that POTUS will treat Yemen in the same double game that State treats Pakistan and Egypt.  We pay iron-handed bosses to police the jihadists; and the iron-handed bosses do nothing because the jihadists are their ticket to ride the money from the West.  Who is more at fault?  The crook who takes our money; or we who stuff the pockets of crooks?  Below find Ali Abdullah Saleh (born 1942), president of the Republic of Yemen, waiting for cooperation with POTUS Harrison Ford and successors.

SANA'A CHIEF.jpg



2 Comments

Clinton was president then, it was ok.

I remember that when I saw "Air Force One" I thought to myself that the cinematic President brought all his troubles on himself by mucking about in Central Asian affairs that were none of his business. My take on the movie hasn't changed.

Leave a comment