The John Batchelor Show Lee's Link

What's Breaking News Tonight?

Real Clear Markets: Spooky Parallels 1933 and 2009

| 4 Comments

Thumbnail image for Picture 2.png

Spooky Parallels Between 1933 and 2009

  By John Batchelor

  Watching the moody Scot and Laborite Prime Minister Gordon Brown meet at the White House with President Obama amid worldwide panic, a meeting darkened by a mysterious diplomatic "snub", there is new cause to search for a foreshadowing of troubles. Looking back seventy-six years to the depths of the Great Depression, we find that another moody, isolated Scot and Laborite Prime Minister, Ramsay MacDonald arrived to confer with the new President of the United States, Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

It was April 1933, and the financial crisis, called bluntly in America and Europe "the depression," was in a new panic stage. Following a collapse in world trade and widespread protectionism, not to mention massive bank failures and severe price deflation in America, Congress had given the president what were understood as temporary dictatorial monetary powers. While the PM was crossing the sea, Roosevelt made the decision for the U.S. to go off the gold standard. The market reaction in New York and London was one of shock and worry. Senator Reed of Pennsylvania, in opposition to Roosevelt, said this was "frankly a programme of currency manipulation."

MacDonald was in a rush when the gigantic Cunarder Berengaria delivered him to a municipal tug that steamed to Jersey City for a train to Washington. There was a general sense the Americans didn't know where they were going.

MacDonald's "flying visit" had a threefold purpose: to befriend the new president, to debate the causes of worldwide "economic ills," and to encourage and hurry up the proposed World Economic Conference in London. MacDonald needed the Economic Conference to stop a trade war that he felt was wrecking Britain and Europe.

For four days, Saturday through Tuesday, at the White House and on the presidential yacht Sequoia, the two leaders and their aides ranged over tariffs, deflation, currency policy, market instability, military adventurism in Asia, and the new regime in Germany. Roosevelt was brash and powerful.

Somewhat surprisingly, the seemingly opaque MacDonald alarmed the Americans by making bold remarks at the National Press Club, broadcast nationally on the radio, in which the PM emphasized that the gold suspension was a "great crisis," his regret that some were using the "ugly" word "retaliation" with regard to the President's decision, and that there was now even greater need to focus on the London Conference in order to agree upon "common action."

"I hope our French friends, our Italian friends, and all others will be spurred to seek agreement rather than be discouraged and make no attempt. Tarrifs, restrictions of all kinds, quotas - of what use are they in a free, sane world where exchange is as profitable in trade as in ideas?"

HU056074.jpgRamsay MacDonald's question deserved an answer in 1933 no less than it deserves an answer today. "Retaliation" was the weapon of choice that doomed the London Economic Conference in June of that year, and that opened the door for those who Paul Johnson names the Devils in Germany, Japan, and Russia.

The gold suspension, the paradoxical fears of deflation and inflation, currency policy: all were pieces of the larger face of the protectionist creature loosed in America by the sinister Smoot-Hawley legislation of 1930, and present in many guises in the Four Powers of Europe, as well as in Soviet Russia and predatory Imperial Japan. We know now that the failure of MacDonald and Roosevelt to agree on reversing the trade collapse ahead of the Conference was the last opportunity the two states would have - ever - before the trade war morphed into the military campaigns of 1936 and beyond.

Returning to the present, it is a simple, rational mission for Gordon Brown and Barack Obama. Brown calls his ambition "a global new deal," but it is not necessary to oversell it with cable news concepts. What Messrs. Brown and Obama need to do, is to accomplish what MacDonald and Roosevelt did not. They must arrive at the G20 meeting next month in London united on trade, and with a vocal sense of alarm that world governments are following an anti-trade script that will surely end wretchedly.

John Batchelor is a radio host in New York, Washington, San Francisco and Los Angeles.
Page Printed from: http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2009/03/spooky_parallels_between_1933.html at March 04, 2009 - 02:48:58 PM CST

4 Comments

"Tariffs, restrictions of all kinds, quotas - of what use are they in a free, sane world where exchange is as profitable in trade as in ideas?" - Ramsay MacDonald's question indeed deserves an answer today. But the world is not sane - if it ever was. We know only too well the inevitable results of protectionism.

Ideas too must circulate in order to keep a nation from slipping into madness. My mother always said, "Don't live alone." I took her advice and found a wife. That too would produce its own special brand of madness. But at least I survived long enough to give it yet another shot.

The madness of two can always be resolved – by separation, if need be; whereas the madness of one is lethal. Witness Gaza, where only one ideology reigns. Witness our own universities; our newspapers and now, our one-party government. If my theory holds, all these will implode in due time. Already there are fractures developing among heretofore monolithic Democrats themselves. This can not be blamed on Republicans. They are now for all intents and purposes outside the margins. The lot of them could be roundly swept up into an insignificant heap by the doorjamb, dwarfed by the considerable shadow of a single rotund entertainer.

WHY SNUB BROWN?

Snubbing Brown doesn't make any sense. Similarly, if you don't like a bust of Churchill, put it in the National Gallery. If you don't think it's art, stick it in the basement. But to return it? To be intentionally rude? It's not at all diplomatic. What's going on?

Maybe, it's a variation on the class warfare theme being played at home: Be rude to Britain. A signal to others -- France? -- that we want to be friends. If this is the case, and I certainly hope it isn't, our international relations may go the way of the Dow.

So much for our "image on the world's stage".

There's the makings for another great show this weekend.

vsk

I predict we will repeat history again. president teleprompter will go to the UK G-20 meeting and he will wax clean the notion that America needs to protect itself economically ringing a clear sound that yes, we will continue the protectionist attitude we are recreating ala Smoot - Hawley. We are past a recession and in a depression.

Leave a comment